data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23ec3/23ec3d5bd0851ce833e042bcb7468d6dfee88c85" alt="National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ebbf6/ebbf674e8648bb1253add0f506447209b078c3b6" alt="National Weather Service"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fe72/5fe72c1cfec67977e413c6e15a966da6baff1252" alt="United States Department of Commerce"
Flood Potential Outlook
Issued by NWS Twin Cities, MN
Issued by NWS Twin Cities, MN
Versions:
1
502 FGUS73 KMPX 131707 ESFMSP MNC003-009-013-015-019-023-037-049-053-073-079-103-123-127-129-139- 141-143-145-153-163-171-173-WIC011-035-091-093-109-282359- Probabilistic Hydrologic Outlook National Weather Service Twin Cities/Chanhassen MN 1107 AM CST Thu Feb 13 2025 ...The Spring Flood Threat is Below Normal Across Southern Minnesota and West Central Wisconsin this Year... The overall lack of precipitation this winter has led to a below normal spring flood threat for this coming spring. Soil conditions are overall drier than normal with portions of the area remaining in drought. However, there are a couple of potential flood factors to keep in mind related to the temperatures being much colder than last year, combined with the snow-free ground. Those factors are deeper than normal frost penetration and near to above normal ice thickness on area rivers and streams. The snow free ground coupled with cold spells throughout the winter has led to frost penetrations of generally two to three feet. Typically for this time of year, the frost depth is generally one to less than two feet, so it is significantly deeper this year. This could become a factor for spring flooding if our area receives significant snow between now and Spring, or receives significant rain, or a combination of the two. Simply put, there is more runoff potential when the ground is frozen. A similar story can be said about ice thickness on area rivers and streams. For ice jams to form, additional flow is needed. So, this threat is conditional upon future precipitation. If our area receives significant precipitation and runs off into the rivers, then the above average ice thickness would pose more of a threat of ice jams occurring. In terms of the upcoming weather pattern, the outlooks indicate a lean towards below normal precipitation for the latter half of February. Looking further out in time, the seasonal outlooks do not indicate a strong signal in terms of above, near, or below normal temperatures or precipitation. In Table 1 below, the current (CS) and historical/normal (HS) probabilities of exceeding minor, moderate, and major flood stages are listed for the valid time period. When the value of CS is greater than that of HS, the probability of exceeding that level is higher than normal. When the value of CS is less than that of HS, the probability of exceeding that level is lower than normal. ...TABLE 1--PROBABILITIES FOR MINOR...MODERATE AND MAJOR FLOODING... Valid Period: 02/17/2025 - 05/18/2025 : CURRENT AND HISTORICAL : CHANCES OF EXCEEDING : FLOOD CATEGORIES : AS A PERCENTAGE (%) CATEGORICAL : FLOOD STAGES (FT) : MINOR MODERATE MAJOR LOCATION MINOR MOD MAJOR : CS HS CS HS CS HS -------- ----- ----- ----- : --- --- --- --- --- --- :West Branch Lac Qui Parle River Dawson 39.0 40.0 42.0 : <5 6 <5 <5 <5 <5 :Redwood River Redwood Falls 6.0 15.0 16.0 : 18 24 <5 <5 <5 <5 :Cottonwood River Springfield 22.0 27.0 32.0 : 26 34 10 16 <5 <5 New Ulm 11.0 13.0 16.0 : 21 28 10 18 7 11 :Minnesota River Montevideo 14.0 16.0 17.5 : 17 28 6 18 <5 9 Granite Falls 885.0 889.0 892.0 : 6 19 <5 7 <5 <5 Morton 21.0 23.0 26.0 : 19 33 8 20 <5 7 New Ulm 800.0 804.0 806.0 : 6 18 <5 9 <5 6 Mankato 22.0 25.0 30.0 : 5 11 <5 7 <5 <5 Henderson 732.0 736.0 739.5 : 7 17 <5 8 <5 <5 Jordan 25.0 28.0 34.0 : 13 26 6 15 <5 <5 Savage 702.0 710.0 712.0 : 37 60 6 13 <5 10 :Long Prairie River Long Prairie 7.0 8.0 10.0 : 14 18 <5 6 <5 <5 :Sauk River St Cloud 6.0 7.0 9.0 : <5 10 <5 5 <5 <5 :South Fork Crow River Mayer 11.0 15.0 16.0 : 33 26 10 12 6 8 Delano 16.5 17.5 18.5 : 22 18 16 15 10 12 :Crow River Rockford 10.0 12.0 14.0 : 27 21 13 13 5 8 :Mississippi River St Cloud 9.0 10.0 11.0 : 8 28 <5 15 <5 <5 Hwy 169 Champlin 12.0 14.0 17.0 : 5 19 <5 8 <5 <5 :Rum River Milaca 6.0 7.0 8.0 : 6 7 <5 <5 <5 <5 St Francis 8.0 10.0 11.0 : 17 20 <5 <5 <5 <5 :Snake River Mora 11.0 13.0 14.0 : 15 21 7 8 <5 <5 :Mississippi River Fridley 16.0 16.5 17.0 : <5 8 <5 7 <5 6 St Paul 14.0 15.0 17.0 : 12 23 6 19 <5 12 Hastings L/D#2 15.0 17.0 18.0 : 21 36 6 19 <5 13 Red Wing L/D#3 680.5 681.5 683.0 : 16 23 10 17 <5 8 Red Wing 14.0 15.0 16.0 : 13 20 7 14 6 10 :Cannon River Northfield 897.0 899.0 900.0 : 12 20 <5 5 <5 <5 :St Croix River Stillwater 87.0 88.0 89.0 : 16 23 11 17 6 12 :Eau Claire River Fall Creek 11.0 14.0 17.0 : 5 16 <5 <5 <5 <5 :Chippewa River Eau Claire 773.0 776.0 778.0 : 6 18 6 11 <5 6 Durand 13.0 15.5 17.0 : 18 45 7 19 6 11 LEGEND CS = CONDITIONAL SIMULATION (CURRENT OUTLOOK) HS = HISTORICAL SIMULATION (NORMAL) FT = FEET In Table 2 below, the 95 through 5 percent columns indicate the probability of exceeding the listed stage levels (FT) for the valid time period. ...TABLE 2--EXCEEDANCE PROBABILITIES... CHANCE OF EXCEEDING STAGES AT SPECIFIC LOCATIONS Valid Period: 02/17/2025 - 05/18/2025 LOCATION 95% 90% 75% 50% 25% 10% 5% -------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ :West Branch Lac Qui Parle River Dawson 32.2 32.3 32.7 33.1 33.9 34.4 35.1 :Redwood River Redwood Falls 2.0 2.4 2.7 3.2 4.3 8.8 10.4 :Cottonwood River Springfield 14.3 14.8 15.7 17.2 22.8 26.5 30.1 New Ulm 5.0 5.4 6.3 7.1 10.1 12.7 16.4 :Minnesota River Montevideo 6.1 6.8 8.4 11.4 12.5 14.7 16.6 Granite Falls 881.2 881.5 882.0 882.9 883.3 884.2 886.0 Morton 11.6 12.5 15.3 18.1 20.6 22.5 24.2 New Ulm 787.9 788.4 791.0 793.2 795.8 798.4 801.4 Mankato 7.8 8.7 10.0 11.3 14.7 18.1 22.1 Henderson 718.9 720.0 721.9 724.5 727.9 731.0 734.2 Jordan 10.4 11.3 13.8 17.9 23.2 25.9 28.9 Savage 689.5 691.8 694.9 698.7 703.9 708.3 710.9 :Long Prairie River Long Prairie 3.8 4.1 4.8 5.5 6.4 7.3 7.7 :Sauk River St Cloud 2.1 2.4 3.1 3.7 4.7 5.5 6.0 :South Fork Crow River Mayer 5.0 5.4 7.2 9.3 12.0 15.0 16.2 Delano 9.5 9.9 11.9 13.7 16.2 18.5 19.5 :Crow River Rockford 4.3 4.6 5.8 7.2 10.1 12.7 14.8 :Mississippi River St Cloud 5.7 6.0 6.2 6.8 8.1 8.9 9.5 Hwy 169 Champlin 5.2 5.5 5.9 6.5 9.1 11.2 12.8 :Rum River Milaca 2.7 2.8 3.2 3.5 4.1 5.0 6.1 St Francis 4.7 5.1 5.6 6.2 7.5 8.7 9.3 :Snake River Mora 5.8 6.3 7.3 8.0 9.6 11.9 13.7 :Mississippi River Fridley 6.2 6.9 7.7 8.6 11.2 13.3 15.0 St Paul 3.7 4.7 5.7 7.2 11.2 14.3 16.3 Hastings L/D#2 6.4 7.4 8.5 10.3 14.4 16.6 17.9 Red Wing L/D#3 671.6 673.0 674.7 675.9 678.7 681.5 682.7 Red Wing 5.3 5.9 7.1 8.1 10.8 14.4 16.4 :Cannon River Northfield 891.9 892.3 893.2 894.1 895.0 897.2 897.7 :St Croix River Stillwater 77.4 78.9 80.5 81.8 84.6 88.2 89.9 :Eau Claire River Fall Creek 4.8 5.3 6.2 7.0 8.3 9.9 11.1 :Chippewa River Eau Claire 763.1 763.6 765.0 766.3 768.8 771.0 776.5 Durand 7.4 7.7 8.9 10.5 12.2 13.8 17.8 In Table 3 below, the 95 through 5 percent columns indicate the probability of falling below the listed stage levels (FT) for the valid time period. ...TABLE 3--NONEXCEEDANCE PROBABILITIES... CHANCE OF FALLING BELOW STAGES AT SPECIFIC LOCATIONS Valid Period: 02/17/2025 - 05/18/2025 LOCATION 95% 90% 75% 50% 25% 10% 5% -------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ :West Branch Lac Qui Parle River Dawson 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 :Redwood River Redwood Falls 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 :Cottonwood River Springfield 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 New Ulm 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 :Minnesota River Montevideo 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 Granite Falls 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 Morton 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 New Ulm 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 Mankato 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.9 Henderson 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.0 0.9 Jordan 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.0 Savage 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.3 :Long Prairie River Long Prairie 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 :Sauk River St Cloud 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 :South Fork Crow River Mayer 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 Delano 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 :Crow River Rockford 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 :Mississippi River St Cloud 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 1.8 1.7 Hwy 169 Champlin 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.4 :Rum River Milaca 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 St Francis 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 :Snake River Mora 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 :Mississippi River Fridley 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.2 3.1 St Paul 5.2 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 4.8 4.6 Hastings L/D#2 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 4.9 4.7 Red Wing L/D#3 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.7 7.4 7.0 Red Wing 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.0 7.8 7.3 :Cannon River Northfield 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 :St Croix River :Eau Claire River Fall Creek 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 :Chippewa River Eau Claire 2.3 2.2 1.9 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 Durand 3.6 3.5 3.1 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 These long-range probabilistic outlooks contain forecast values that are calculated using multiple season scenarios from more than 70 years of climatological data, along with current conditions of the river levels, soil moisture, and snow cover. This information is available online in graphical format, at https://www.weather.gov/twincities These outlooks are issues bi-weekly through mid March $$