Quantitative Precipitation Forecast
Issued by NWS
Issued by NWS
286 FOUS11 KWBC 241925 QPFHSD Probabilistic Heavy Snow and Icing Discussion NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD 225 PM EST Sun Nov 24 2024 Valid 00Z Mon Nov 25 2024 - 00Z Thu Nov 28 2024 ...Upper Great Lakes to New England... Days 1-2... The merger of 2 areas of upper level energy, one an upper level low over the Canadian Prairies and the other a shortwave ejecting out of the Colorado Rockies, will work to greatly increase the lift over the Upper Great Lakes on Monday. A 100 kt jet streak will support the upper level low extending southeastward, further increasing the lift in the region. A strong surface cold front will act to increase surface forcing for the development of a low near the Missouri/Illinois/Iowa tripoint, tracking northeast to near Chicago and across Michigan and into eastern Ontario by Tuesday. With the added forcing to the north of the low, the comma-head region of the low will be near Lake Superior...from the Arrowhead of Minnesota to the U.P. of Michigan. Periods of heavy snow are likely in this region, with support from the lake due to cold air advection over the relatively warm lake resulting in localized lake enhancement over the U.P., particularly in favored upslope areas such as the Porcupine and Huron Mountains. Into New England, which will be on the cold frontal/warm side of the low as it moves into Canada Tuesday, some of the colder valleys could see a brief period of freezing rain where the cold air currently in place remains trapped. PWPF for ice >0.10 inches are about 20-40% over far interior/NW Maine and northern NH. ...Pacific Northwest... Days 1-2... Upper low off the coast will finally move inland over SW OR and weaken on Tuesday, with onshore flow ahead of it for D1 over the Cascades where several inches of snow are likely. Snow levels are around 3000-4000ft from north to south (WA to OR) and will rise briefly tomorrow before falling again as QPF wanes and finally moves away from the area by the end of D2. ...Sierra Nevada... Days 1-3... Persistent WSW flow will continue for the next few days as waves of moisture flow across the central and especially southern Sierra, bringing significant heavy, wet snow to higher elevations. Moisture will start to impact the Sierra tonight and early Monday and quickly become heavier tomorrow afternoon and peak into Tuesday as PW/IVT approach record levels for this time of year per the NAEFS ESAT and CFSR period. 700mb 0C line will lie W-E from central CA eastward to the UT/AZ border, suggesting high snow levels and generally a heavy/wet snow for many areas (and likely lower SLR values). NBM shows snow levels around 7500ft (north) to perhaps 10,000ft (south) coinciding with the heaviest QPF. With >2-3" liquid, even at <10:1 ratios, multiple feet of snow are likely in the highest elevations. Snow levels will drop as QPF starts to decrease into D3 once the shortwave to the north moves out of the Great Basin. For the three-day period, WPC probabilities for at least 12 inches of snow are high (>70%) above ~7000-8000ft. ...Wasatch, CO Rockies... Days 2-3... Several rounds of forcing in the upper levels will impact the region through Wednesday. A zonal 140 kt upper level jet will impinge over UT and CO on Tuesday, taking advantage of ample amounts of atmospheric moisture advecting into CA from continued onshore flow from the Pacific. Once the zonal jet shifts eastward, a strong shortwave trough will approach the area on Wednesday, resulting in much heavier snow across the Wasatch and CO Rockies. The shortwave will be supported by a separate 120 kt zonal jet over the Southwest. Thus, multiple days of very favorable forcing and continued moisture advection from the Pacific will result in a broad 2 to 4 feet of snow over many of the higher elevations. Meanwhile where temperatures can remain below freezing, accumulations could approach a foot through Wednesday in the neighboring valleys. The probability of significant ice >0.25 inches across the CONUS is less than 10 percent. Wegman/Fracasso $$